Direct participation
A direct participant is a bank or financial institution that holds a domestic central bank settlement account in each country where it uses the service and holds a full banking license. Direct participants integrate with both the Pan African Payment and Settlement System and the central bank's real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system for the prefunding cycle.
That route gives you control and hands you the obligations. You fund and defund your own clearing account, and you carry the liquidity risk of an underfunded position. Central banks themselves are direct participants and act as national settlement agent.
Indirect PAPSS integration
An indirect participant signs a sponsorship agreement with a domestic direct participant, which provides settlement services in each country where the indirect participant uses the Pan African Payment and Settlement System. Under those sponsorship agreements with direct participants, the sponsor issues funding instructions and supplies the liquidity that funds or defunds the clearing account.
The sponsor absorbs the settlement mechanics, and your obligations remain with you. Customer due diligence and your reconciliation stay with you. A sponsorship agreement is a funding and settlement arrangement, so read it as one and don't assume it transfers liability for a payment you originated.
Route comparison
Direct participation requires a central bank settlement account and a licence in each country of operation. You fund your own clearing account through the central bank’s RTGS system, manage direct connectivity to PAPSS and the RTGS, and handle full ISO 20022 message generation and parsing. You are also responsible for incident handling with PAPSS and the central bank.
Indirect participation requires a sponsorship agreement with a domestic direct participant. The sponsor provides liquidity and issues funding instructions on your behalf. Connectivity is managed through the sponsor or a technical connectivity provider, with a narrower message scope. You handle customer-facing support, while the sponsor takes ownership of settlement incidents.
Neither route wins on its own terms. Direct participation costs more to build and gives you pricing control plus independence from a competitor's balance sheet. Indirect participation gets you live faster and leaves your corridor economics partly in someone else's hands. A licensed bank with an existing RTGS account that already handles treasury in several currencies has little reason to go indirect. A payment service provider without central bank settlement access has no choice to make.
Settlement and liquidity
The central bank in each country or region selects the settlement model when joining the network, and it determines who funds settlement and who sets your rates. The Pan African Payment and Settlement System operates two: the Central Bank Settlement Model, known as SSA-1, and the Commercial Bank Settlement Model, known as SSA-3.
Under SSA-1 the central bank provides the settlement funds and sets the applicable foreign exchange rates. Participating commercial banks fund their accounts at the central bank in local currency, and the central bank acts as national settlement agent with oversight across the process. Under SSA-3 the participating commercial banks provide the settlement funds and set the rates themselves, and they manage settlement risk and limits directly. There's no requirement to use the central bank RTGS under that model, though the central bank keeps its supervisory role and full visibility of settlements.
The practical difference lands on your treasury and pricing teams. Under SSA-1 you take the rate you're given and your margin comes from fees. Under SSA-3 you own the rate and the spread. Confirm which model applies in every country on your corridor map before you model revenue, because the same corridor can have different answers at each end.
Liquidity is the constraint nobody plans for early enough. PAPSS cannot create depth in a currency pair that has none, which is why it launched the African Currency Marketplace with Interstellar in 2025, an order-book venue where 80 corporates traded 12 pairs during the pilot. "Payments alone were not enough," said Mike Ogbalu III, CEO of PAPSS. "Firms still face trapped capital due to limited currency convertibility and dependency on hard currencies."